苹果|美论坛：美国禁止华为，为什么中国不能禁止苹果或特斯拉这种公司( 三 ) 华为|耐克|iPhone|手机行业

苹果和耐克与国家安全和关键基础设施关系不大。苹果和耐克的目标是最终消费者（个人），而华为则制造支持现代文明的关键电信基础设施。除了面向消费者的产品外，华为还生产网络安全芯片、数据中心设备、路由器等。

It would be unthinkable for the US government to be allowed to actively interfere with Apple’s product development but this situation is not unthinkable for companies headquartered in China.
美国政府被允许积极干预苹果公司的产品开发是不可想象的，但这种情况对于总部设在中国的公司来说并非不可想象。

美国网友的观点
iPhone and Nike are mass-market consumer items. Their brand is part of the appeal. Arranging a ban means disappointing several million customers.
苹果手机和耐克都是大众消费品。他们的品牌是吸引力的一部分。安排禁令意味着让数百万客户失望。
Huawei mainly serves large corporate and government clients. Their products are already subject to several stages of approval. Arranging a ban is comparatively straightforward.
华为主要服务于大型企业和政府客户。他们的产品已经经过了几个阶段的审批。安排禁令相对简单。
It’s also not the Chinese approach. The Chinese prefer to go with punishing individual companies with regulatory burdens bureaucratic obstacles mysterious infrastructure failures and other forms of aggressive non-cooperation rather than ban them outright. That gets far closer to what they see as the problem failure to cooperate for the harmony of all rather than what US people tend to see as the problem failure to adhere to a point of principle which is more traditionally tackled with a ban.
这也不是中国的做法。中国人更愿意通过监管负担、官僚障碍、神秘的基础设施故障和其他形式的激进不合作来惩罚个别公司，而不是彻底禁止它们。这更接近他们认为的问题，未能为所有人的和谐而合作，而不是美国人倾向于认为的问题，未能坚持原则，传统上通过禁令来解决 .
Finally the Chinese export to the US far more than they import. A tit-for-tat cycle of bans would hit them harder. Far better to do other things instead.
最后，中国对美国的出口远远超过进口。针锋相对的禁令循环将对他们造成更大的打击。相反，做其他事情要好得多。

I’m sure no one really doubts the Chinese could ban high-profile US products but it’s not hard to see why that’s not the approach they would want to take.
我敢肯定，没有人真的怀疑中国会禁止备受瞩目的美国产品，但不难看出为什么这不是他们想要采取的方法。

印度网友的观点
The question just shows little you are technologically aware: less than than a caterpillar! IPhone and Nike are consumer products.
这个问题只是表明您对技术的了解很少：比毛毛虫还少！iPhone和耐克是消费品。

The Nike company itself is consumer-oriented but not Apple. Apple is more than just iPhone. Likewise Huawei is not a product: it is a whole ecosystem.
耐克公司本身是面向消费者的，但苹果公司不是。苹果不仅仅是苹果手机。同样，华为也不是一个产品:它是一个完整的生态系统。
Huawei is not just a phone. It is an entire system of back-end equipment related to internet and mobile telephony similar to Ericsson ZTE Cisco Ciena Samsung and Nokia. It also has consumer brand-name phones.
华为不仅仅是一部手机。它是一个与互联网和移动电话相关的后端设备的完整系统，类似于爱立信、中兴、思科、三星和诺基亚。它也有消费品牌手机。
You are likely the type who cannot distinguish between Ethernet and Ethereum. Only someone with your genius can compare a sports shoe with a new cutting-edge 5G communications ecosystem.